Introducing XML::SAX::Machines, Part Two
In last month's
column we began our introduction to
XML::SAX::Machines, a group of modules which greatly
simplifies the creation of complex SAX application with multiple
filters. This month we pick up where we left off by further
illustrating how XML::SAX::Machines can be used to
remove most of the drudgery of building SAX-based XML processing
applications. If you have not read last month's offering, please do
so now.
In last month's column we created a simple mod_perl handler that uses
SAX::Machines to allow developers and HTML authors to use custom
tag libraries in their HTML documents. This example was fine, as far as it went,
but it can be made a lot more robust and flexible with very little effort. For example,
the list of SAX filters in the previous example was hard-coded into the handler
script itself. One of the best features of the interface that SAX::Machines
provides is that the filter chains and other machine definitions can be built dynamically
at run-time using simple Perl arrays.
For our first example this month we will extend the previous MachinePages
handler to capitalize on SAX::Machines' dynamic abilities by allowing
the SAX filters applied to a given document to be passed in through Apache's configuration
API. In addition, we will give developers the option to apply one or more XSLT stylesheets
to the filtered SAX event streams; again, allowing the choice of stylesheets to
be selected via configuration directive.
package SAXWeb::MachinePages;
use strict;
use Apache::Constants;
use XML::SAX::Machines qw( :all );
use XML::Filter::XSLT;
use XML::SAX::Writer;
sub handler {
my $r = shift;
my @filters;
With the basic initialization out of the way, we can begin reading in
the list of filters that are to be applied to the given request. We
do this by calling the dir_config method on the
Apache::Request object, processing the string containing
a custom MachineFilters option (if on exists) into an array, and
pushing that array onto our global list of SAX filters.
if ( defined( $r->dir_config('MachineFilters') ) ) {
my @widgets = split /\s+/, $r->dir_config('MachineFilters');
push @filters, @widgets
}
Next, we use dir_config to check for a MachineStyles option and, if present,
we process that option and use the resulting filenames to configure a chain of
XML::Filter::XSLT instances As above, we append those
instances onto the top-level
list of filters to be applied to the event stream.
if ( defined( $r->dir_config('MachineStyles') ) ) {
my @stylesheets = split /\s+/, $r->dir_config('MachineStyles');
foreach my $stylesheet ( @stylesheets ) {
my $xsl_filter = XML::Filter::XSLT->new();
$xsl_filter->set_stylesheet_uri( $stylesheet );
push @filters, $xsl_filter;
}
}
Note the difference between this block and the previous one. In the MachineFilters block
we simply added strings containing the class names of the SAX filters to the list of
filters, while, here, we have created instances of the XML::Filter::XSLT class and
pushed those blessed objects onto the list. XML::SAX::Machines invisibly copes
with both cases by autoloading and creating new instances of those filter classes passed
in as plain strings, while working in the predictable way for those
filters which are passed as blessed references.
Moving on, we create a new XML::SAX::Writer object and set its output
stream to point at a plain scalar variable inventively named $output.
my $output = ''; my $writer = XML::SAX::Writer->new( Output => \$output );
Next, we create a Pipeline machine, which gives us linear chain of
SAX filters, passing in the list of filters we have collected and setting the
instance of XML::SAX::Writer as the final handler.
my $machine = Pipeline(
@filters,
$writer
);
We then call the machine's parse_uri method, passing in the file name
of the document that client requested.
$machine->parse_uri( $r->filename );
Note that we did not create an instance of a SAX parser class, but, rather, called
parse_uri on the Pipeline object. Again,
XML::SAX::Machines "does what you mean" in this case by creating an
instance of an XML::SAX parser behind the scenes.
To finish off our Apache handler, we have to set the appropriate HTTP headers and send the result of the SAX process to the client.
$r->content_type('text/html');
$r->send_http_header;
$r->print( $output );
return OK;
}
1;
Our new MachinePages handler now allows for fine-grained control over which filters are applied to which documents using options from the server-wide httpd.conf file or .htaccess files.
PerlSetVar MachineFilters "My::FilterOne My::FilterTwo" PerlSetVar MachineStyles "/www/htdocs/stylesheets/default.xsl ..."
These options can be used as-is or wrapped in <Directory>,
<Files>, <FilesMatch> containers, or any of
the other common Apache configuration control blocks, for greater control.
|
|
| Post your comments |
In complex applications where producing XML is only one part of the
overall functionality provided, it is often wise to keep the XML
processing facilities as separate from the core application as
possible. One way to achieve this is to create an abstract
"controller" class that handles the gory details; allowing the core
application to call a few simple methods to achieve complex
results. XML::SAX::Machines is especially well-suited
for creating these simple but powerful abstract controllers. For our
second and final example we will build a class that implements this
pattern.
Consider the following illustration:
We see from this diagram that the SAX controller class is responsible for establishing the SAX processing chain from end to end, while providing a simple one-stop interface to the rest of the application. The application simply calls one or two methods in the controller class to obtain the result it expects
|
The developer initializes a new Controller object inside the core application, passing in instances of the desired Generator, Handler, and any desired Filters.
The developer calls the Controller's parse()
method, passing in whatever data the Generator needs to
initialize the SAX event stream.
The Controller passes that data along to the Generator via
the prepare() method (if it implements one).
If implemented, the Generator's prepare()
method examines or alters the data passed and returns the
(possibly altered) data back to the Controller. During this
examination, the Generator has a chance to see what it is
about to parse and has the opportunity to set additional
Filters.
The Controller calls the Generator's
set_filters() method (if implemented) to
retrieve any additional Filters.
The Controller initializes the SAX filter chain (via
SAX::Machines ), setting the passed Handler as
the Machine's final SAX Handler, and the Machine itself as
the event handler for the passed Generator.
The Controller calls the Generator's parse()
method, passing in the altered data returned from the
prepare() method.
The Generator begins the SAX event stream, firing the events
( start_document, start_element,
end_document, etc.) at the first Filter in the
chain, if any.
The final Filter (or Generator, if no Filters were added to the chain) fires the SAX events at the Handler. The Handler does something with the data passed through the event methods (builds a DOM tree, writes an XML document to the file system or browser, etc.)
The result of the parse is returned to the application.
Let's get down to business and create the actual controller.
package MyController; use strict; use vars qw( $DefaultSAXHandler $DefaultSAXGenerator); use XML::LibXML; use XML::SAX::Machines qw( :all ); $DefaultSAXHandler ||= 'StringWriter'; $DefaultSAXGenerator ||= 'XML::SAX::ParserFactory';
After a bit of initialization, we create the constructor for our
controller. Borrowing from XML::SAX::Machines' DWIM
nature, we will provide default classes for the Generator and
Handler options, allowing developers to pass these in either as
simple class names or blessed instances.
sub new {
my $class = shift;
my %args = @_;
my $self;
if ( defined $args{Handler} ) {
if ( ! ref( $args{Handler} ) ) {
my $handler_class = $args{Handler};
eval "require $handler_class";
$args{Handler} = $handler_class->new();
}
}
else {
eval "require $DefaultSAXHandler";
$args{Handler} = $DefaultSAXHandler->new();
}
if ( defined $args{Generator} ) {
if ( ! ref( $args{Generator} ) ) {
my $driver_class = $args{Generator};
eval "use $driver_class";
$args{Generator} = $driver_class->new();
}
}
else {
eval "use $DefaultSAXGenerator";
$args{Generator} = $DefaultSAXGenerator->new();
}
$args{FilterList} ||= [];
$self = bless \%args, $class;
return $self;
}
Next, we get to the meat of the controller class, the
parse() method. In addition to allowing developers to
pass SAX filters in during initialization, we will go a step further
by allowing the SAX generator to set additional filters by giving it
a chance to see what it's about to parse (via an optional
prepare() method).
Also, we will send the result of the generator's
prepare() as the sole argument for its
parse() method. This idea is especially interesting
given the fact that SAX event streams can be generated from more
than just XML documents. So, for example, we could easily write a
custom SAX generator that subclasses
XML::Generator::DBI and implements a
prepare() method that maps URLs to specific SQL
queries. In that case, prepare() would return the SQL
select statement rather than the URL passed in from the core
application.
sub parse {
my $self = shift;
my $to_be_parsed = shift;
# filters passed to the object from the application side.
my @filterlist = @{$self->{FilterList}} || ();
# give the Generator a peek at what it's about to parse and alter it, if needed.
if ( $self->{Generator}->can('prepare') {
$to_be_parsed = $self->{Generator}->prepare( $to_be_parsed );
}
# allow filters to be passed from the generator
# (could be hard-coded, or filters set during prepare()).
if ( $self->{Generator}->can('get_filters') {
push @filterlist, $self->{Generator}->get_filters;
}
# build the filter machine, setting the last stage to the passed Handler
my $machine = Pipeline( @filterlist, $self->{Handler} );
# set the generator to fire its events at the pipeline
$self->{Generator}->set_handler( $machine );
# get the result and return it to the app.
my $parse_result = $self->{Generator}->parse( $to_be_parsed );
return $parse_result;
}
To keep things flexible, we will also provide a few simple configuration methods for setting up the SAX controller.
sub set_handler {
my $self = shift;
my $handler = shift;
if ( defined( $handler ) ) {
if ( ! ref( $handler ) ) {
my $handler_class = $handler;
eval "use $handler_class";
$self->{Handler} = $handler_class->new();
}
else {
$self->{Handler} = $handler;
}
}
}
sub set_generator {
my $self = shift;
my $generator = shift;
if ( defined( $generator ) ) {
if ( ! ref( $generator ) ) {
my $generator_class = $generator;
eval "use $generator_class";
$self->{Generator} = $generator_class->new();
}
else {
$self->{Generator} = $generator;
}
}
}
sub set_filterlist {
my $self = shift;
my @filters = @_;
$self->{FilterList} = \@filters;
}
1;
That's it, we're done with our controller. Here are a few examples of how it may be called from the core application.
For those who like methods --
my $sax_controller = MyController->new(); $sax_controller->set_generator( 'Some::Generator' ); $sax_controller->set_handler( $my_blessed_instance ); $sax_controller->set_filterlist( 'XML::Filter::Foo', 'XML::Filter::Bar' ); my $result = $sax_controler->parse( $something );
And the same for those who like constructor arguments instead --
my $sax_controller =
MyController->new( Generator => 'Some::Generator'
Handler => $my_blessed_instance,
FilterList => \@list_of_filter_names);
my $result = $sax_controler->parse( $something );
As with the MachinePages example above,
XML::SAX::Machines adds significant value to our
application by making the filter chain both easy to configure and
trivial to create dynamically.
Also in Perl and XML |
|
OSCON 2002 Perl and XML Review PDF Presentations Using AxPoint |
XML::SAX::Machines makes the task of creating complex
SAX-based application extremely simple and straightforward, while
providing a level of flexibility that would by painful at best to
duplicate by hand. It offers a modern, easy-to-use interface that,
like all Perlish things, makes easy things easy and makes hard
things... well, not just possible, but easy, too. If you are
considering SAX as the API of choice for your XML processing
applications, XML::SAX::Machines should be at the top
of your evaluation list.
XML.com Copyright © 1998-2006 O'Reilly Media, Inc.