Article:		Parsing RSS At All Costs
Subject:		Agreed. So what's your solution?
Date:		2003-01-22 18:36:10
From:		Mark Pilgrim
Response to: This Article is Quite Depressing
The tone of the article is based on the demonstrated realities of the RSS world, which I agree is depressing. Are you proposing a solution (other than the two I proposed)? Or are you just idly wishing that life was easier for developers?

Previous Message

Up

Next Message

• Agreed. So what's your solution?
  2003-01-30 09:00:19 Jon Wickström

• Agreed. So what's your solution?
  2003-01-22 20:27:27 Dare Obasanjo
  • Benefits and harms are not evenly distributed
    2003-01-22 21:24:36 Mark Pilgrim
    • Benefits and harms are not evenly distributed
      2003-01-23 08:03:10 bryan rasmussen
      • Benefits and harms are not evenly distributed
        2003-01-23 11:40:03 Aaron Swartz
      • End-user perspective
        2003-01-23 08:37:02 Mark Pilgrim
        • End-user perspective
          2003-01-24 03:55:28 bryan rasmussen
        • Breaking Industry Standards A Competitive Advantage?
          2003-01-23 10:08:12 Dare Obasanjo
          • Robustness Principle
            2003-01-23 10:40:11 Mark Pilgrim
            • You Prove My Point
              2003-01-23 11:11:58 Dare Obasanjo
              • xml dev posts?
                2003-01-24 03:35:19 bryan rasmussen
  • Agreed. So what's your solution?
    2003-01-22 20:47:33 Max Daymon
    • Agreed. So what's your solution?
      2004-03-04 09:56:00 Richard Prosser
    • Auto-reporting
      2003-01-22 21:07:36 Mark Pilgrim
      • Do both
        2003-01-22 22:42:19 Chris Adams