Sign In/My Account | View Cart  
advertisement

Article:
 XML Data-Binding: Comparing Castor to .NET
Subject: Very little meat in this article
Date: 2002-07-26 07:43:09
From: Dare Obasanjo

I was hoping to be enlightened about the similarities and differences between Castor and XML Serialization in .NET but this article is little more than one long sample. Shorter samples would have been appreciated so that time could have been spent discussing the pros and cons of each approach to XML data bindings. If longer samples were absolutely necessary you could have provided them as downloads or links to them on another site so there would be room in the article for meat.


Secondly I see that your next article is a comparison of JDO and ADO.NET. For your information, the current released version of ADO.NET is not really a comparable technology to JDO since ADO.NET is primarily about traditional access to relational data sources in much the same manner as JDBC while JDO is more about object-relational mapping. Microsoft ObjectSpaces which has been previewed in a number of places is the comparable technology to JDO. More information on ObjectSpaces can be obtained by Googling for "Microsoft ObjectSpaces" which should lead you to enough information to write an informative article about both technologies.


No Previous Message Previous Message   Next Message Next Message


Sponsored By: