|
1) 'Inverse properties are quite common. If A is the father of B, then B is the child of A. The properties "father" and "child" are the inverse of each other.'
This should state that If A is the *parent* of B, then B is the child of A. The properties "parent" and "child" are the inverse of each other.
2) "Only one of the properties need carry the daml:inverseOf property, as it is reflexive."
This property is symmetric, not reflexive.
3) Throughout the article, 'parseType="..."' is used. These should all be 'rdf:parseType="..."'
Thanks to Bijan Parsia for catching (1) and (2), and to "cicho" for catching (3).
|