Article:		The Evolution of JAXP
Subject:		Very informative article
Date:		2005-07-07 01:26:56
From:		jdeegan
Thanks for your excellent summarization of JAXP's evolution and the helpful code snippets. I noticed, however, that one of your diagrams was duplicated and another (Figure 1 ?) perhaps missing. Also, in the 'Evaluating XPath Expressions' example code, should the statement be: Document doc = parser.parse(new File("employees.xml")); jdeegan

Previous Message

Next Message

• Very informative article
  2005-07-11 00:26:24 RahulS [Reply]
  
  Thanks jdeegan. The missing figure is now in place. Well, I agree using "employees.xml" as the filename would have been a better choice, but it doesn't matter. "data.xml" is not wrong either.