Article:		Perl Parser Performance
Subject:		Performance comparison
Date:		2005-03-28 09:26:02
From:		DavidinMD
Great data - Would be helpful in the future to post details about the machine used as well (CPu type, memory, clock, FSB speed, etc) .....That lets us look at some of the raw computation loads and capabilities as the machines evolve as well. Cheers / Dave L.

Previous Message

Next Message

• Performance comparison
  2008-02-22 07:45:34 PamelaCranston [Reply]
  
  I am looking for David F. Davis formerly of Hagerstown, MD re. your family HX research - Davis, Frazier, Lee etc.
  Please contact me ASAP.
  Pamela Cranston
  pcranstn@pacbell.net
  
  

• Performance comparison
  2005-05-26 13:37:48 VladIS [Reply]
  
  XML::Parser is the best q.e.d. I think that the other configuretions will show the similar results. Let well alone.
  
  
  

• Performance comparison
  2005-04-04 06:52:14 Petr Cimprich [Reply]
  
  OK, but you should be able to reproduce the test with your own hardware if you are interested in such detailed hw info.