Article:		Introducing PyRXP
Subject:		PyRXP unicode conformance
Date:		2004-02-29 00:19:46
From:		Arno Paehler
I find the comments on "non-conformance" does not do justice to PyRXP. I use PyRXP extensively. My problem set does not contain ANY unicode and "conformance" hence is a non-issue. Memory footprint and speed in this case DO however matter, as I am dealing with processing roughly 50,000 files with on-disk sizes of up 450 MB for the largest file containing roughly 900,000 tags. Processing time of said file with an Athlon XP 1800+ and 1.5 GB memory was about 20 minutes and I do not dare to imagine what time any DO(o)Med implementation might take. Summary: you need conformance because you are an archaeologist, try something else. BUT PyRXP is an ooutstanding tools disqualified and trashed in a very unqualified way.

Previous Message

Next Message

• PyRXP XML non-conformance
  2004-02-29 07:38:04 Uche Ogbuji
  • PyRXP XML non-conformance
    2004-06-24 15:30:16 PaulMayer
    • PyRXP XML non-conformance
      2004-06-29 14:47:16 Uche Ogbuji