>> Mark's REST version of the service would encode
>> the complex data types and binary as, erm, text
>> representations.
In what format? URL-encoded XML? How easy will that be to edit by hand, since editors for URL-encoded XML are not thick on the ground?
On the programming side, putting the output of an XML serializer through an URL encoder would not be difficult; just pointless.
Sorry, but having data in an URL instead of XML makes sense only when the data format is trivially simple.
David
|