Article:		Typeless Schemas and Services
Subject:		Anonymous Complex Types
Date:		2003-09-24 06:58:37
From:		Rich Salz
Response to: Anonymous Complex Types
Sure; it's also called "Russian Doll" design in certain cases; see http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/11/29/schemas/part1.html Don't define types, only define elements, and either "inline" those elements directly within the containing element (as shown above), or use the "ref" item to do the equivalent of #include. :)

Previous Message

Up

Next Message